A Voice For Truth -

Search

Home
Infographics
Videos
White Paper
Position Statement
COVID-19
Resources
About
Contact
A Voice For Truth -
  • Home
  • Infographics
  • Videos
  • White Paper
  • Position Statement
  • COVID-19
  • Resources
  • About
  • Contact
Christianity, COVID-19 Vaccine, Vaccines and abortion

Help with requesting religious exemptions from vaccinations

August 24, 2021 by Admin No Comments

 

If you’re reading this, chances are you or someone you love are facing the very real possibility of losing your job, maybe even your career. You’re wondering what you’ll do next and how you’ll provide for yourself and your family. You may be reading through tears. You may be far past the tears and just angry. Now you’re faced with having to prove your religious convictions and in many ways, this is just too much. You many be asking yourself, “where do I even begin”?

Well, this article is for you. It’s here to give you help and suggestions when writing and submitting your own religious exemption letter to your employer. It may feel like a daunting or scary task, but hopefully this will ease the stress.

Here are some things to consider.

First, there are only 2 requirements for a religious exemption:

  1. It has to be about your personal religious beliefs (not that of your church or any organized religion), and
  2. Your beliefs have to be sincerely held

Second, there are 3 important parts to communicate in your letter requesting a religious exemption:

  1. Share what you believe (try to be as specific as you can when stating your belief(s), and try to back them up with something that supports the reason for your belief, like a bible verse)
  2. Share how your religious belief is opposed to vaccines or how vaccines violate your religious faith (try to make a clear connection between your religious beliefs and how they would be violated by taking a vaccine)
  3. Conclude with a definitive statement (at the end of your letter, make a clear conclusion with an absolute statement objecting to the vaccine, saying something like “so I can’t take it” or “my religious beliefs prevent me from getting the vaccine” or “therefore I cannot take the vaccine”)

Tips:
In your letter, your personal religious belief(s) are all that matter. It’s best to leave out anything medical, scientific, political, or legal related to vaccines. Even if you believe vaccines are harmful, it’s not relevant to a religious exemption. It’s best not to mention vaccine harm, ongoing clinical trials, toxic ingredients, etc. Only your religious beliefs need to be included… not even your religious affiliation or denomination. Sometimes giving your employer more information than needed can work against getting your religious exemption approved.

 

Example religious exemption letter

Below is an example of an exemption letter. Please change it and make it personal to you. Remember, it’s important to show your beliefs are sincerely held. Writing your own personal letter demonstrates your sincerity. Simply copying someone else’s letter or signing at the bottom of a form letter may actually undermine the sincerity you want to show. It’s ok to use other letters as inspiration, but nothing is as strong as your own words. Letters from churches or religious leaders can be useful as supportive or follow-up documents if they should they be needed after your letter is submitted.

[Date]

Dear [Name of HR professional/Religious exemption contact/Employer Name],

This letter is to request a reasonable accommodation and religious exemption from the COVID-19 vaccine required by [name of employer].

Share what you believe. (try to be as specific as you can when stating your belief(s), and try to back them up with something that supports the reason for your belief, like a bible verse)

Share how your religious belief is opposed to vaccines or how vaccines violate your religious faith. (try to make a clear connection between your religious beliefs and how they would be violated by taking the vaccine – see the Vaccine Position Statement for People of Faith for biblical arguments and relevant verses)

Conclude with a definitive statement. (make a clear conclusion with an absolute statement objecting to the vaccine, saying something like “so I can’t take it” or “my religious beliefs prevent me from getting the vaccine” or “therefore I cannot take the vaccine”)

Thank you for reviewing my request for a reasonable accommodation and religious exemption from [name of employer]’s COVID-19 vaccination requirement.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

*Feel free to copy and paste this example… just make sure to personalize it!

 

Attorneys helping with religious exemption cases

  • The Liberty Counsel has a dedicated page to help with religious exemptions. It’s a great place for even more information and sample letters. Also, if you feel like you need legal assistance, you can request help by filling out their online form
  • The law firm of Siri & Glimstad has a vaccine exemptions page and detailed FAQ pages for religious vaccine exemptions in the workplace and in schools and universities, as well as immigration exemptions. They also offer paid legal help with your exemption process.

More resources

    • The Vaccine Position Statement for People of Faith is a theologically-based statement signed by people around the world. It presents religious beliefs against the use of abortion in the making of vaccines.
    • Megan Redshaw’s article provides useful information including biblical supports that may be helpful in writing your religious exemption letter.
    • The Vault Project’s article provides a thorough explanation of law applicable to religious vaccine exemption requests, and helps you understand your rights as an employee.
    • National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) has information on what laws exist to protect employees and adults from vaccine mandates
    • The Rutherford Institute provides guidance on how to request a religious exemption in the workplace.

    PRINT ARTICLE


    *Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not providing legal advice. If you need legal advice, please contact an attorney.

  • Christianity, COVID-19 Vaccine, Vaccines and abortion

    Taxpayers to fund human fetal tissue research from abortion… again

    April 18, 2021 by Admin No Comments

    President Biden wasted no time reinstating the use of aborted fetal tissue at The National Institutes of Health (NIH). After pressure from 26 House democrats and some in the scientific community, the NIH announced its reversal of the 2019 Trump administration policy. American taxpayers will once again pay for the harvesting and trafficking of aborted baby body parts.

    Friday’s notice said NIH grant applicants and contracts involving aborted fetal tissue use will no longer be subject to review by an ethics advisory board. The NIH is dissolving the Human Fetal Tissue Research Ethics Advisory Board, which had previously rejected all but 1 applicant proposing to use aborted human fetal tissue.

    Democratic lawmakers praised the Biden administration for prioritizing “science over politics,” saying Trump’s ban simply contained “arbitrary barriers” to researchers.

    Aborted Fetal Tissue is NOT Necessary

    Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra and democratic lawmakers would have us believe human fetal tissue is the only option for critical scientific research. This could not be further from the truth.

    Human fetal tissue from abortions is not necessary. There are other available and effective options that do not support the abortion industry.

    Tara Sander Lee, Ph.D., of The Charlotte Lozier Institute reminds us,

    “There are superior and ethical alternatives available such as adult stem cell models being used by countless scientists worldwide to develop and produce advanced medicines treating patients now, without exploitation of any innocent life.”

    She went on to say,

    “All scientists should reject the administration’s attempts to prey on fears related to the pandemic to advance the practice of harvesting fetal tissue.”

    A Christian’s Responsibility

    Truly, all Christians and people of faith should reject the harvesting of fetal tissue.

    We can no longer put our heads in the sand and plead innocent. Aborted baby body parts are used for science (including vaccines). This is a fact, not a debatable opinion.

    The silence of the church is now its consent. The silence of people of faith is now their consent.

    There is no neutral position on this issue. If you are pro-life, then you must act. Abortion is not just about a mother and her baby. It is a tragic, unethical industry. We know Planned Parenthood attempts to persuade women into abortions, provides intentionally inadequate informed consent, and goes so far as to change abortion techniques when preparing to sell a particular baby’s body parts for research.

    Your money is paying for research grants requiring aborted baby body parts and tissues

    Your money is paying to fund Planned Parenthood

    Your money is paying for trafficking human baby body parts

    Like it or not, the lines being drawn today make it clearer than ever before. Our demand for a COVID-19 vaccine (and other medication) supports Planned Parenthood performing abortions and pays for trafficking the aborted baby body parts (through 3rd party companies that supply our NIH funded researchers). It comes full circle when we take that same COVID-19 vaccine (and other medication) that was created with our taxpayer dollars on the backs of aborted babies through trafficking of fetal body parts.

    Sadly, the abortion industry is supported by all of us – everyday Americans – and it’s being done right under our noses. We can no longer let fear prevent us from being willing to see it. This is not just a problem for a scared woman you don’t know who finds herself in a difficult position. Our ongoing silence supports the very industry persuading her into an abortion.

    The abortion industry hopes you will turn a blind eye. They hope your fear will prevail and prevent you from taking action.

    Will you take action?

    COVID-19 Vaccine, Vaccines and abortion

    COVID-19 Resources and Information

    March 31, 2021 by Admin No Comments

    VFT has new COVID-19 content and resources to share with you! In fact, there’s an entire page dedicated to COVID-19. Here’s some of what you’ll find:

    • Important facts about COVID-19 shots. Since no two people are created alike, informed consent is a critical component in making the best healthcare decisions for you and your family.
    • Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson’s clinical trials are still in progress. Get the clinical trial timelines for each phase in relation to when each vaccine was authorized for mass use.
    • Credible resources with information that will help you research and better understand COVID-19 vaccines.
    • Information about abortion-tainted COVID-19 vaccines

    We will continue to add resources and information to this page, so please check back often.

    COVID-19 Vaccine

    Rushed vaccines that harmed and failed Americans? We’ve been here before.

    February 25, 2021 by Admin No Comments

    “Mom, WHY do I have to do this? History is sooo boring. Who even cares what happened 50 years ago?”

    Like typical kids, mine were whining about what felt like pointless busy work. 50 years ago – that’s ancient history, right? As I heard my own response, it reminded me of an important truth: history matters because we have a tendency to repeat it – especially the negative history – and it’s important to learn from it instead. Theodore Roosevelt said it well, “The more you know about the past, the better prepared you are for the future.”

    In light of that, are you aware of the surprising similarities between 1976 and 2020? Perhaps 2020 was not as “unprecedented” as we thought.

    1976

    1976 was an election year with a Republican incumbent who was ultimately defeated by a Democrat. In February, a young, presumably healthy army recruit died from a swine flu virus. The narrative around his cause of death led to wide-spread fear as it was compared to the 1918 flu pandemic. Large-scale deaths were predicted. In March, the CDC director (Dr. David J. Sencer) called on President Ford to begin a mass vaccination program. Ford sunk $137 million tax payer dollars into rushing vaccine development. Concerns about the safety of the vaccines were raised and quickly dismissed. Meanwhile, Congress passed legislation indemnifying vaccine manufacturers. By early October, Americans were lining up to receive the completed vaccine. 10 weeks later, 25% of Americans had received the vaccine, which left 25 dead and over 500 with Guillain-Barre syndrome (impacts peripheral nervous system and can lead to paralysis). The deaths and serious adverse reactions resulted in the vaccination program being shut down completely. The government, embarrassed over its failure, fired the CDC director.

    2020

    Now compare 1976 with the story of COVID-19 we all know too well. The outbreak began in China in late 2019. Concerns in the US led to lockdowns beginning in March 2020. Fears soared as COVID-19 was compared to the 1918 flu pandemic. Operation Warp Speed quickly granted billions of tax-payer dollars to pharmaceutical companies for vaccine development. Concerns over the safety of the vaccines were raised and dismissed. Meanwhile, the PREP Act protects vaccine manufacturers by providing immunity from liability during a declared emergency. Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna produced the first Emergency Use Authorized vaccines that were rolled out in the US on Dec. 14, 2020. Similar to 1976, many deaths and serious adverse reactions resulted from the rushed vaccines. This is where the similarities end.

    Differences

    Deaths from COVID-19 vaccines far exceed what we saw in 1976. There have been over 900 deaths in the first 8 weeks of COVID-19 shots (with only 13% of Americans receiving it). Yet, our vaccination program continues.

    FACT: 25 deaths in 10 weeks shut down the 1976 rushed, government-funded vaccination program.

    FACT: 900+ deaths in 8 weeks from a rushed, government-funded vaccination program seem to be ignored in 2021. *Update: 38,541 deaths reported as of March 28, 2025 (VAERS updates every Friday). See footnote for the weekly running list.

    Contrary to our government’s reaction in 1976, the US seems to be doubling down on the messaging that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and greater uptake is essential in order to return to normal life. One example is this Facebook message to users.

    What will you do?

    Examining this history makes me wonder:

    • Why aren’t we hearing about COVID-19 vaccine-related deaths on the news?
    • Why are we still being told the vaccines are safe?
    • Why are over 900 deaths (and counting) acceptable in 2021 when just 25 were shameful in 1976?
    • What has changed and how have we changed since 1976?

    Like my kids, some may be tempted to say, “Who cares what happened in 1976? Things are different now.” Yes, we have a different virus, but part of the response is history repeated (both our response and the government’s response). The question is, what will you do about it?


    Note: Total COVID-19 vaccine deaths reported to CDC’s VAERS database in USA (updated weekly through Sept. 2023, then updated monthly):

    • 38,541 deaths Mar. 28, 2024
    • 38,476 deaths – Feb. 28, 2024
    • 38,398 deaths – Jan. 31, 2024
    • 38,264 deaths – Dec. 27, 2024
    • Dec. 13, 2024 *This marks 4 years of COVID vaccine adverse reaction data
    • 38,190 deaths – Nov. 29, 2024
    • 38,068 deaths – Oct. 25, 2024
    • 37,966 deaths – Oct. 04, 2024
    • 37,910 deaths – Sept. 06, 2024
    • 37,814 deaths – Aug. 02, 2024
    • No update – July 26, 2024
    • 37,734 deaths – June 28, 2024
    • 37,647 deaths – May 31, 2024
    • 37,544 deaths – Apr. 26, 2024
    • 37,382 deaths – Mar. 29, 2024
    • 37,231 deaths – Feb. 23, 2024
    • 37,100 deaths – Jan. 26, 2024
    • 36,986 deaths – Dec. 29, 2023
    • Dec. 15, 2023 *This marks 3 years of COVID vaccine adverse reaction data
    • 36,726 deaths – Nov. 24, 2023
    • 36,501 deaths – Oct. 27, 2023
    • 36,324 deaths – Sept. 29, 2023
    • 36,286 deaths – Sept. 22, 2023
    • 36,231 deaths – Sept. 15, 2023
    • 36,173 deaths – Sept. 08, 2023
    • 36,135 deaths – Sept. 01, 2023
    • 36,080 deaths – Aug. 25, 2023
    • 35,980 deaths – Aug. 18, 2023
    • 35,911 deaths – Aug. 11, 2023
    • 35,821 deaths – Aug. 04, 2023
    • 35,726 deaths – July 28, 2023
    • 35,646 deaths – July 21, 2023
    • 35,611 deaths – July 14, 2023
    • 35,596 deaths – July 07, 2023
    • 35,549 deaths – June 30, 2023
    • 35,487 deaths – June 23, 2023
    • 35,443 deaths – June 16, 2023
    • 35,398 deaths – June 09, 2023
    • 35,347 deaths – June 02, 2023
    • 35,272 deaths – May 26, 2023
    • 35,302 deaths – May 19, 2023
    • 35,387 deaths – May 12, 2023
    • 35,324 deaths – May 05, 2023
    • 35,274 deaths – Apr. 28, 2023
    • 35,219 deaths – Apr. 21, 2023
    • 35,152 deaths – Apr. 14, 2023
    • 35,096 deaths – Apr. 07, 2023
    • 35,048 deaths – Mar. 31, 2023
    • 34,965 deaths – Mar. 24, 2023
    • 34,819 deaths – Mar. 17, 2023
    • 34,725 deaths – Mar. 10, 2023
    • 34,653 deaths – Mar. 03, 2023
    • 34,576 deaths – Feb. 24, 2023
    • 34,478 deaths – Feb. 17, 2023
    • 34,385 deaths – Feb. 10, 2023
    • 34,270 deaths – Feb. 03, 2023
    • 34,122 deaths – Jan. 27, 2023
    • 33,904 deaths – Jan. 20, 2023
    • 33,746 deaths – Jan. 13, 2023
    • 33,591 deaths – Jan. 06, 2023
    • 33,469 deaths – Dec. 30, 2022
    • 33,334 deaths – Dec. 23, 2022
    • 33,011 deaths – Dec. 16, 2022 *This marks 2 years of COVID vaccine adverse reaction data
    • 32,828 deaths – Dec. 9, 2022
    • 32,621 deaths – Dec. 2, 2022
    • 32,508 deaths – Nov. 25, 2022
    • 32,370 deaths – Nov. 18, 2022
    • 32,220 deaths – Nov. 11, 2022
    • 31,961 deaths – Nov. 4, 2022
    • 31,818 deaths – Oct. 28, 2022
    • 31,696 deaths – Oct. 21, 2022
    • 31,569 deaths – Oct. 14, 2022
    • 31,470 deaths – Oct. 7, 2022
    • 31,330 deaths – Sept. 30, 2022
    • 31,214 deaths – Sept. 23, 2022
    • 31,071 deaths – Sept. 16, 2022
    • 30,935 deaths – Sept. 9, 2022
    • 30,796 deaths – Sept. 2, 2022
    • 30,605 deaths – Aug. 26, 2022
    • 30,479 deaths – Aug. 19, 2022
    • 30,347 deaths – Aug. 12, 2022
    • 30,162 deaths – Aug. 5, 2022
    • 29,981 deaths – July 29, 2022
    • 29,790 deaths – July 22, 2022
    • 29,635 deaths – July 15, 2022
    • 29,460 deaths – July 8, 2022
    • 29,273 deaths – July 1, 2022
    • 29,162 deaths – June 24, 2022
    • 29,031 deaths – June 17, 2022
    • 28,859 deaths – June 10, 2022
    • 28,714 deaths – June 3, 2022
    • 28,532 deaths – May 27, 2022
    • 28,312 deaths – May 20, 2022
    • 28,141 deaths – May 13, 2022
    • 27,968 deaths – May 6, 2022
    • 27,758 deaths – Apr. 29, 2022
    • 27,532 deaths – Apr. 22, 2022
    • 27,349 deaths – Apr. 15, 2022
    • 26,976 deaths – Apr. 8, 2022
    • 26,693 deaths – Apr. 1, 2022
    • 26,396 deaths – Mar. 25, 2022
    • 26,059 deaths – Mar. 18, 2022
    • 25,641 deaths – Mar. 11, 2022
    • 25,158 deaths – Mar. 4, 2022
    • 24,827 deaths – Feb. 25, 2022
    • 24,402 deaths – Feb. 18, 2022
    • 23,990 deaths – Feb. 11, 2022
    • 23,615 deaths – Feb. 4, 2022
    • 23,149 deaths – Jan. 28, 2022
    • 22,607 deaths – Jan. 21, 2022
    • 22,193 deaths – Jan. 14, 2022
    • 21,745 deaths – Jan. 7, 2022
    • 21,382 deaths – Dec. 31, 2021
    • 21,002 deaths – Dec. 24, 2021
    • 20,622 deaths – Dec. 17, 2021 *This marks 1 year of COVID vaccine adverse reaction data
    • 20,244 deaths – Dec. 10, 2021
    • 19,886 deaths – Dec. 3, 2021
    • 19,532 deaths – Nov. 26, 2021
    • 19,249 deaths – Nov. 19, 2021
    • 18,853 deaths – Nov. 12, 2021
    • 18,461 deaths – Nov. 5, 2021
    • 18,078 deaths – Oct. 29, 2021
    • 17,619 deaths – Oct. 22, 2021
    • 17,128 deaths – Oct. 15, 2021
    • 16,766 deaths – Oct. 8, 2021
    • 16,310 deaths – Oct. 1, 2021
    • 15,937 deaths – Sept. 24, 2021
    • 15,386 deaths – Sept. 17, 2021
    • 14,925 deaths – Sept. 10, 2021
    • 14,506 deaths – Sept. 03, 2021
    • 13,911 deaths – Aug. 27, 2021
    • 13,627 deaths – Aug. 20, 2021
    • 13,068 deaths – Aug. 13, 2021
    • 12,791 deaths – Aug. 6, 2021
    • 12,366 deaths – July 30
    • 11,940 deaths – July 23, 2021
    • 11,405 deaths – July 16, 2021
    • 10,991 deaths – July 9, 2021
    • 9,048 deaths – July 2, 2021
    • 6,985 deaths – June 25, 2021
    • 6,136 deaths – June 18, 2021
    • 5,993 deaths – June 11, 2021
    • 5,888 deaths – June 4, 2021
    • 5,165 deaths – May 28, 2021
    • 4,406 deaths – May 21, 2021
    • 4,201 deaths – May 14, 2021
    • 4,057 deaths – May 7, 2021
    • 3,837 deaths – April 30, 2021
    • 3,544 deaths – April 23, 2021
    • 3,186 deaths – April 16, 2021
    • 2,602 deaths – April 10, 2021
    • 2,342 deaths – April 2, 2021
    • 2,249 deaths – March 26, 2021
    • 2,050 deaths – March 19, 2021
    • 1,739 deaths – March 12, 2021
    • 1,524 deaths – March 5, 2021
    • 1,265 deaths – Feb. 26, 2021
    • 1,095 deaths – Feb. 19, 2021
    • 929 deaths – Feb. 12, 2021
    • 653 deaths – Feb. 5, 2021
    • 501 deaths – Jan. 29, 2021
    • 329 deaths – Jan. 22, 2021
    • 182 deaths – Jan. 15, 2021
    COVID-19 Vaccine

    COVID-19 Vaccines prompt requests to lift fetal tissue research ban

    April 30, 2020 by Admin 1 Comment

    Many people holding pro-life values still wonder if there is any truth to the claim that aborted fetal tissue is used in vaccine research and development. VFT, along with others like Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, Children of God for Life, No Deception, Marcella Piper-Terry, My Informed Choice, and more have been consistently presenting peer-reviewed science and truth about aborted fetal cell line use. Yet somehow, misunderstandings linger.

    An example is a US Congressman whose strong pro-life stance is commendable. His April 2020 newsletter stated, “In fact, aborted fetal tissue has never been used to produce a single vaccine.” It seems he is unaware, just as many pro-life people are.

    On the other hand, President Trump is aware. He knows there have been billions of US dollars funding aborted fetal tissue research. For example, it was the National Institutes of Health (NIH) – through its National Institute on Aging division – that funded the creation of human fetal cell lines IMR-90 and IMR-91.

    Recognizing this threat to the sanctity of human life, in June 2019 President Trump discontinued NIH research “involving the use of human fetal tissue from elective abortion.” The NIH Notice placed new restrictions on outside research receiving NIH funding. The Health and Human Services press release clearly stated, “research that requires new acquisition of fetal tissue from elective abortions will not be conducted.”

    This step was taken because, “Promoting the dignity of human life from conception to natural death is one of the very top priorities of President Trump’s administration.” Many of you reading this hold the same priority.

    His actions are an admirable step in the right direction, but the demand for aborted fetal tissue in research is high. The onset of COVID-19 and urgent calls for a vaccine have brought that demand into clear focus. The vaccine industry in particular has a long, 60+ year history of using aborted fetal tissue in its research and development. The scientific community’s desire to use human fetal tissue for developing COVID-19 vaccines is in direct opposition to the President’s ban. As a result, some have begun voicing their concerns.

    Government officials have also raised their voices urging the ban to be lifted. Attorneys General in states across the US sent a letter to the President on March 26, 2020, with their “concern that the current Fetal Tissue Ban that took effect in June 2019 is hampering our Nation’s ability to address COVID-19.” The letter shared how fetal tissue has been an “essential tool” and “instrumental” in studies. The end of the letter articulated just how critically important the scientific community views the use of human fetal tissue when it stated:

    “… the scientists’ position on this issue has been clear: currently, there are no alternatives to human fetal tissue that have been shown to be as powerful in conducting these important studies across a broad range of research topics.“

    Then, in their April 6, 2020 letter, some members of Congress wrote “to ask that you immediately waive the restrictions on research with human fetal tissue, which are preventing federally-funded scientists from advancing important studies that could potentially prevent, treat, or cure the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19).”

      If there was ever any question as to the vital importance the scientific community places on the use of fetal tissue from abortions, these two letters should answer those once and for all.

    These letters show how the use of fetal tissue from abortions is so common it feels necessary and critical to some in the scientific community. This long-term and on-going practice of using aborted fetal tissue in vaccine research and development has been ignored by many pro-life people and organizations. The scientific community interprets our silence as implied consent.

    It is time to expose the truth and stand up for the sanctity of ALL human life.

    As of this writing, there are at least FIVE vaccines in development for COVID-19 using aborted fetal cell lines. The pleading in the letters from members of Congress and state AGs prompted by COVID-19 vaccine development reveal just how reliant the scientific community has become on human fetal tissue for vaccine research.

    Vaccines should be produced ethically, without the use of aborted fetal cell lines. Period. The fear of COVID-19 and the desire for a vaccine is no excuse to use aborted fetal tissue.

    Please remain watchful and well-informed during these unprecedented times.

    COVID-19 Vaccine

    COVID-19 Vaccines using aborted fetal cell lines

    April 23, 2020 by Admin 6 Comments

    *11.14.21 click here for a full update to this article.

    *Post updated 1.12.21 and 1.26.21. See footnotes.

    A lot has changed in the last couple of months, and our lives look drastically different than they did when we began 2020. Words like “COVID-19” that didn’t even exist a few months ago now dominate our news cycles 24/7. Previously foreign concepts like social distancing and stay-at-home orders are now part of our “new normal.”

    While I don’t want to add to the 24/7 COVID-19 bombardment, I do want to make you aware of how COVID-19 and aborted fetal cell lines intersect.

    With COVID-19 spreading around the globe and urgent calls for a vaccine, there is a race to bring the first COVID-19 vaccine to market. Many companies and academic institutions have joined the race, which is being fast-tracked by skipping important phases of testing.

    There are many COVID-19 vaccines in development that are being tracked by the WHO, including the front runners. Like me, those who are disturbed by the use of human fetal cell lines in vaccines will want to know about the 5 COVID-19 vaccines in development that are using human fetal cell lines. Several of these are front runners in phase 1 or phase 2 clinical trials, and one is aiming to be completed as early as September!

    5 COVID-19 vaccines using human fetal cell lines

    1. Moderna/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). This US company is utilizing a new mRNA vaccine technology that has not yet been approved for market. According to a Science magazine article, the spike (S) protein used in the research and development of the vaccine is made with the HEK-293 human fetal cell line. Moderna is in phase 1 trials according to the WHO update on April 11, 2020.
      *12.20.20 correction: The spike protein made using HEK-293 was used during Moderna’s research for its COVID-19 vaccine, but is NOT in the final vaccine product.
      *1.26.20 note: Please see footnote for a more detailed explanation of the use of HEK-293 in the research and development of the modified spike protein Moderna used to encode its mRNA vaccine.
    2. CanSino Biologics/Beijing Institute of Biotechnology. These two Chinese companies are developing an adenovirus-based vaccine using the HEK-293 human fetal cell line. CanSino was approved to begin phase 1 clinical trials on March 17, 2020, and are in phase 2 trials according to the WHO update on April 11, 2020.
    3. AstraZeneca/The University of Oxford/Jenner Institute. This collaborative effort on a COVID-19 vaccine is also using the HEK-293 human fetal cell line. Human trials will begin soon.
    4. Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies (owned by Johnson and Johnson). This US company uses the PER.C6 human fetal cell line for its vaccine, and was in preclinical trials according to the WHO update on April 11, 2020. Johnson & Johnson received a $456 million contract from the US Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) on March 27, 2020.
    5. University of Pittsburgh. This US academic institution is developing its vaccine based on the HEK-293 human fetal cell line. This vaccine is being developed around the use of a unique microneedle delivery system, which is 400 tiny needles on a Velcro-like patch. Human trials will begin soon.

    History of HEK-293 & PER.C6 fetal cell lines

    • HEK-293 human fetal cell line (HEK = Human Embryonic Kidney) was derived from a human fetus aborted in the Netherlands in the early 1970s. The kidney tissue cultures were collected by Dr. Alex van der Eb in 1972, and then used to develop the HEK-293 fetal cell line by Dr. Frank Graham in 1973. According to Dr. Alex van der Eb, the abortion was “probably” done in 1972. The history of HEK-293 was not documented according to van der Eb who said, “We had no donor information on 293 or what was available got lost.”
    • PER.C6 human fetal cell line was developed in 1985/1995 from the retinal tissue of an aborted fetus at 18 weeks gestation. The retinal cultures were taken by Dr. Alex van der Eb in 1985, but it wasn’t until 1995 that the PER.C6 cell line using those cultures was developed by Dr. Ron Bout and Dr. Frits Fallaux. According to Crucell (now part of Janssen Pharmaceutical), maker of PER.C6, “PER.C6® technology supports the growth of a wide variety of human disease-causing viruses that can subsequently be processed into vaccines. It can be used for the manufacturing of inactivated whole virus, live-attenuated, live-vector, split and subunit vaccines. PER.C6® technology also allows for efficient production of recombinant vaccines.”

    Can a safe COVID-19 vaccine be developed?

    Compared to normal pharmaceutical drugs, vaccines (classified as biologics) are already fast tracked. But now we’re experiencing the COVID-19 super fast track, which is skipping critical testing phases.

    With many known strains of coronaviruses, vaccines have been attempted in the past but proved notoriously difficult to successfully develop. In fact, Dr. Peter Hotez (who worked on a SARS coronavirus vaccine in 2003) said the coronavirus vaccines carry “a risk of immune enhancement” – which means when animals were exposed to a coronavirus after vaccination, they had a more exaggerated reaction to the virus (even death) compared to unvaccinated animals. Hotez went on to say, “The way you reduce that risk is first you show it does not occur in laboratory animals.” The animal testing phase of coronavirus vaccines is shown to be critical, yet this phase was completely skipped by Moderna.

    Hotez’s experience with developing coronavirus vaccines gives him unique first-hand knowledge of the risks of accelerating the COVID-19 vaccine development timeline. Hotez “understand(s) the importance of accelerating timelines for vaccines in general,” but said, “from everything I know, this is not the vaccine to be doing it with.”

    In addition to these deep concerns, we know human fetal cell lines pose safety risks and can cause insertional mutagenesis, autoimmunity and cancer.

    These COVID-19 vaccines are extremely concerning to say the least. Both the fast-tracked development & testing and the use of aborted fetal cell lines pose serious risks.

    Please remain watchful and well-informed during these unprecedented times.


    *Note: The information presented in this post is accurate as of April 23, 2020. However, the landscape is changing rapidly, so updates will be provided as they come.

    *1.12.21 General Update: There are now many more COVID-19 vaccines using aborted fetal cell lines either in the production of the vaccine itself or in the research, development, or testing. These include the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines already in use under the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization (EAU) AND vaccines still in development. For a complete list of these vaccines, please refer to the Charlotte Lozier Institute.

    *1.26.21 Moderna Update: There is some confusion around the use of HEK-293 aborted fetal cell line during the research and development of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine. Moderna’s mRNA vaccine encodes for “a prefusion stabilized form of the Spike (S) protein, which was selected by Moderna in collaboration with investigators at the NIAID Vaccine Research Center (VRC).” This means Moderna and NIAID created a new and modified spike protein that is more stable than the spike protein found in SARS-CoV-2. This NIH article specifically states that 1) “NIAID scientists designed the stabilized spike antigen” and 2) NIAID is working with Moderna to develop its “messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine, which directs the body’s cells to express the spike in its prefusion conformation to elicit an immune response.” This Science magazine article detailing the creation of the modified spike protein used by Moderna states “Plasmids encoding the heavy and light chains of S230, 80R and m396 IgG were transiently transfected into Expi293 cells (Thermo Fisher) using polyethylenimine.”  Expi293 cells refers to the HEK-293 aborted fetal cell line. The scientific evidence shows Moderna used HEK-293 fetal cell line in the research and development of its COVID-19 vaccine which led to the production of its vaccine, mRNA-1273, which is now being widely used. The new, stabilized spike protein was used for the encoding of the mRNA vaccine. Even though HEK-293 fetal cell line was not used in the final product, some people of faith find it deeply troubling that it was used in R&D at all.

    *1.26.21 Correction: An earlier version of this post incorrectly referenced a Lancet article in the section about Moderna. The article was intended to be referenced in bullet point 5 about the vaccine microneedle delivery system.

    Languages

    • English
      • Deutsch (German)
      • Nederlands (Dutch)

    Wondering about vaccines & abortion? Watch these.

    https://avoicefortruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Abortion-vaccines-video.mp4

    “It’s Ok” from Choice42.com

    Popular Articles

    COVID-19 Vaccines using aborted fetal cell lines

    COVID-19 Vaccines using aborted fetal cell lines

    April 23, 2020
    Abortion, the human fetal cell industry and vaccines

    Abortion, the human fetal cell industry and vaccines

    October 31, 2019
    COVID-19 Vaccines prompt requests to lift fetal tissue research ban

    COVID-19 Vaccines prompt requests to lift fetal tissue research ban

    April 30, 2020
         SIGN the Vaccine
         Position Statement
    

    Let’s Connect!



    Recent Articles

    Now that I know, what can I do? 10 attainable action steps.

    Now that I know, what can I do? 10 attainable action steps.

    June 15, 2023
    Newborn abortion survivor legislation at risk even as thousands celebrate March for Life

    Newborn abortion survivor legislation at risk even as thousands celebrate March for Life

    January 22, 2023
    Why the blackout on fetal tissue research among pro-lifers?

    Why the blackout on fetal tissue research among pro-lifers?

    February 9, 2022
    2021 Update: COVID-19 vaccines using aborted fetal cell lines

    2021 Update: COVID-19 vaccines using aborted fetal cell lines

    November 14, 2021
    Help with requesting religious exemptions from vaccinations

    Help with requesting religious exemptions from vaccinations

    August 24, 2021
    Taxpayers to fund human fetal tissue research from abortion… again

    Taxpayers to fund human fetal tissue research from abortion… again

    April 18, 2021
    COVID-19 Resources and Information

    COVID-19 Resources and Information

    March 31, 2021
    Rushed vaccines that harmed and failed Americans? We’ve been here before.

    Rushed vaccines that harmed and failed Americans? We’ve been here before.

    February 25, 2021
    The beauty and burden of the knowledge of evil

    The beauty and burden of the knowledge of evil

    September 19, 2020
    COVID-19 Vaccines prompt requests to lift fetal tissue research ban

    COVID-19 Vaccines prompt requests to lift fetal tissue research ban

    April 30, 2020

    Categories

    • Christianity
    • COVID-19 Vaccine
    • Vaccines and abortion

    Tags

    abortion Abortion-derived fetal cell lines adverse events adverse reactions Bible catholic Christian christians conscience protections conscientious objections coronavirus COVID-19 COVID-19 vaccines COVID-19 vaccines and christianity death DNA employer vaccine mandates evil fetal cell lines Fetal DNA fetal tissue fetal tissue research health human trafficking legislation March for life pro-life religion religious exemption safety satan science scientific research vaccine debate vaccine exemption vaccine mandates vaccines vaccine safety

    Archives

    • June 2023
    • January 2023
    • February 2022
    • November 2021
    • August 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • September 2020
    • April 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • October 2019
    • January 2019
    © 2019 - 2025 A Voice For Truth • All Rights Reserved
    • English
    • Deutsch
    • Nederlands